
Subsections
Modern packaging protects food, increasing shelf live and safety. It also
makes distribution possible over long distances. Its closures are made to
avoid any undesired alterations after production. This includes safety seals
and other devices to show any criminal poisoning of food by blackmailer.
The best packaging is glass because of its chemical
stability. Industry tries to change glass by one-way packages made of glass
because of price and weight.
Glass is one hundred percent barrier against oxygen. Glass however can break.
The small splinters being undetected present a great hazard to consumers. The industry
spends great efforts to avoid any fragmentation.
Tin cans are widely used for packaging of pasteurized and sterilized food.
They present corrosion with acid medium. Zink, iron and all other metal ions
are the increased in food. Many poisoning cases were caused by the use of zinc
bowls.
Metal ions were drastically reduces by internal coating the cans with layers of
varnish. The wrong varnish can also create a high level of BADGE ( see this
topic).
Small cracks of the varnish layer can cause black dots when chicken meat is present.
The iron of the can reacts with the sulphur of the protein molecules of the
resulting iron sulfide. Quality inspection of the varnish coating is therefore very important.
Packaging made of plastics present new
advantages. There are rigid and flexible packages. Flexible packages may present
active and barrier properties. This is used for meat packaging. At first the
package acts actively to get rid of excessive moisture and works then as
a barrier against oxygen.[318]
[319]
The European packaging regulation EC1935/2004 is related to materials and
articles intended to come into contact directly or indirectly with food.
According to the regulation food packaging material should under normal or
foreseeable conditions of use, not transfer their constituents to food in
quantities which could:
- Endanger human health.
- Bring about an unacceptable change in the composition of the food.
- Bring about a deterioration in the organoleptic characteristics thereof.
The regulation also describes "intelligent food contact materials and articles"
as materials and articles
which monitor the condition of packaged food or the environment surrounding the
food.
The paragraph 15 of the Packaging Regulation describes the labelling requiremets
of food packaging materials.
The Institute of Food Science and Techonology (IFST) says that nanomaterials
used in food packagings should be regulated by the Packaging Regulation.
It contains a list of materials
covered by the regulation.
The war between glassworks and plastic producers fighting for increasing sales
of packaging materials goes on for years. PP and PET is gaining ground because of
lighter weight compared with glass and being unbreakable. These however are
of minor importance when advantages of glass packagings are cited:
- Glass is inert. There is no migration of components of the
plastics to the food. There is no danger of intake of plastic components and
other chemicals and there are no alterations of taste caused by these
substances.
- Glass is a perfect barrier to atmospheric oxygen, avoiding rancidness,
changes of colour such as brown colour of Ketchup.
Plastics can also bear poisons from herbicides, insecticides and other pesticides
when the bottle was wrongly used for these substances.
Reusing bottles which had been used as described before endangers the health of
the consumer because of migration of the polycyclic aromatic components.
To detect and discard these bottles a complicated system called "sniffer"
is being used detecting volatile compounds of pesticides which might be
present in some bottles.
This system covers only a special group of substances. It does not give
an ultimative solution to avoid reusing contaminated packagings.
The Fraunhofer-Institut fr Verfahrenstechnik und Verpackung (IVV)
in Freising, Germany has developed a test of
concerning how inert PET is.
Bringing the material in contact with a sample of four classes of chemicals
(alcoholes, ester, ketones, hydrocarbons and halogenated hydrocarbons) and
measuring the remigration of residues in a test filling medium PET material
can be examined in relation to undesired migration of chemicals in food.
As different PET plastics are produced varying from producer to producer the
migration from chemicals of the packaging material itself and chemicals of
poisonous fillings such as pesticides, cleaning agents,industrial chemicals
and organic poisons such as aflatoxins turning the use, the reuse and even the
recycling of plastics as food packaging a danger for the consumer.
PET bottles are being used increasingly for soft drinks such as cola and
soft drinks, because off flavour caused by migration of plastic chemicals to
food is not noticed by the consumer because of the dominance of the product
flavoring.
Mineral water with carbon dioxide however shows off flavour immediately.
That is why glass bottles are still used for this kind of beverage.
Unfortunately the glass bottle is being changed to PET by Gerolsteiner mineral
water producer in Germany
.
The PET bottle used by Gerolsteiner has acetaldehyde residues which are below
taste level. Acetaldehydes are told to be responsible for apple taste in water.
Karlsberger brewery
tries a new PET for its beer
which is told to be a barrier against oxygen.
According to Walter Jungbauer from
the Bund Natur und Umwelt (BUND) Bonn (Union for
Nature and Environment the PET bottle for
beer is a compound of PET-therephthalat and Nylon in order avoid changes of taste. This
material can very hardly be recycled[495].
The argument of lower weight compared with Glass bottles is insignificant because
of the difficult recycling.
Industry wants to force the one way bottles to get rid of recall of packagings.
The Coca Cola Company
sells water in one-way PET bottles, filled by BEG Badische Erfrischungsgetränke
being deposit free.All other soft drinks of Coca Cola are also sold in this way.
In the early times of the use of plastics as packaging material PVC was the most
common used plastic.
Multilayer-PET-bottle with EVOH barrier
EVOH barrier plastics are copolymers of ethylene and vinylalcohol
and are used as gasbarrier as food packaging in order to avoid oxygen
entering the packaging and to avoid modified atmosphere to leave the
packaging.
Normally the EVOH film is placed between two layers of PET. This method
is used for the production of bottle for beer in order to achieve same
properties of glass bottles. In 6 month storage not more then 10% loss of
CO
and a maximum of 1 ppm of oxygen are allowed for beer glas
bottles.
This material is also used as packaging for ketchup and mayonnaise.
PVC (Polyvinylchlorid)
was banned as food packages because of not entirely polymerized
vinylchlorid (VC) which is
carcinogenic.
PVC creates although environment problems. Being burned chloridrig acid is
formed which is liberated in the atmosphere and turns out to be a part of
the acid rain which is a menace to forests.
PVC is being substituted by many other polymerized products such as:
Polyethylen (PE)
,being used also as layers in other packaging materials.
Heavy density polyethylene (HDPE) which is a higher barrier to oxygen compared to PE,HDPE is used as bottles and tubs
for ketchup, mayonnaise and other products with extended self life, polypropylene (PP) which is mainly used for small
vessels as packaging for fine salads, margarine and dairy products and buckets
such as 10 kg mayonnaise, Ketchup and other products of fast food.
Oriented polypropylene (OPP)
used as
pouches,polyethylene terephthalate (PET).
Barrier resins such as ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVOH)prevent oxygen from
penetrating the package, enhancing flavour, extending shelf life, avoiding
rancidness.
Newcomers are metallocenes in polyolefin product which however are very
expensive. The metallocene blend is based on a thee-layer coextrusion and offers
strong seals at the bottom and sides of the pack with an easy-open top seal.
Specially in frozen food reclosable flexible packaging is used.[318]
Flexible pouches for beverages are made of a combination of PET, aluminum and
polyethylene.
Schöller ice-cream uses
Tritello-Peel Pac in its 1,5 l packaging consisting of a plastic layer covered by
carton. To recycle the customer is asked to separate by hand both materials
and to discard them properly. Only very few people will follow these instructions.
Finish producers offer a combination of carton and three-layer
polymers (High-Barrier-Layer Esobarr). The external
carton is to suggest the packaging being entirely made of recycling carton. The
consumer believes to help environment. He does not know that that compounds of
carton and polymers are almost impossible to recycle. They are burned because a
separation of the carton and the polymer layer would be to expensive. The
arguments of the producer of the Carton-polymer packaging are a better
protection against UV rays, a barrier of gas, flavour and
humidity.
As polymers have low weight compared with other packaging materials when used
as barrier-layer they represent down to 5% of total weight. This argument
however fails to see the problems of recycling. The aim is therefore to find new
materials which can be used as barrier-layer on biopolymer basis being
recycled in nature[320].
One way packagings such as glass bottles, one way PET bottles and beverage cans
made of aluminum or tinplate were in the past used only as outdoor
catering.Nowaday they gain increasingly importance.
The recycling of one way packagings and recycling of PET bottles with deposit
will soon be a task for the industry to avoid to burn the material because
of environment problems.
Recycling is possible as long as there is no mixture of plastic types.
The following products result from recycling:[365]
- The resulting product has technical properties which differ from
the original product.
This is called "downcycling"
PET bottles for beverages can be downcycled to packagings for non-food
- Recycling food packagings material for the production of industrial
textile fibers can be produced.
- Recycled PET material may be used as internal layer of multilayer bottles
- PET material may be used in the steel industry in high temperature ovens
instead of heavy oil
- Today experiments are made to recycle PET bottles to PET recycling granulate
wit identical properties of the original PET using a recondensation step.
The bottles obtained with this technology can be used for food.
[366] Significant savings in emissions are possible by changing the
way how wine is imported. The UK is the largest importer of wine in the world,
Bulk delivery is significantly more cost effective than bringing in bottled
wine.
The study says that manufacturing glass is less carbon intensive than
manufacturing PET. The lower weight of PET bottle compared with glass bottle this
impacts the transport calculation in favour to PET. Comparing carbon emission of
both, there is no gain at any side. Wrap suggests therefore the transportation of
Australian wine in bulk to archive a significant CO2 emission.
Significant reductions in CO2 emissions from the transportation of wine can be achieved by converting wine from shipping in the bottle to bulk importation reducing emissions by 30% to 40%. In addition, lighter glass bottles can also achieve reductions of up to 30%.
WRAP's suggestion ist to bulk shipping and bottling in the UK into the lightest 300g bottles can result in 375g CO2 savings for every 75cl bottle of wine. Recycling and rail transportation whenever possible is being suggested for a further emission reduction.
A cost and carbon savings from adopting either or both of these options is
available at http://winebottles.wrap.org.uk
- Decree to avoid plastic waste from 12.06.1991,Packaging Decree (Verordnung
über die Vermeidung von Verpackungsabfällen vom 12.6.1991 -
Verpackungsverordnung.
- LMBG, Lebensmittel und Bedarfsgenständegesetz (Food and articles of
daily need)
- BGV, Bundesinstitut fr gesundheitlichen Verbraucherschutz (National Institute for
BgVV, embracing the Kunststoffkommission (Plastic commission)
Plastic recyclates are classified by the Plastic Commission of the BgVV in
Germany as follows:
- Class 1 : Primary recyclate from rests of production.
- Class 2 : Secondary recyclate from unclean of the same type of plastic,
such as returned used PET beverage bottles.
As there are no recall of one type of plastics DSD burns this class.
- Class 3 : Mixed plastic types, unclean such as the recall from the DSD
(Duales System Deutschland -Dual System Germany
This class is not suited to reuse as food packaging. DSD burns all plastics
recording it as thermal use
Other plastics used in nonfood articles
Common used plastics in nonfood are
cited here because some of them were in headlines.
Polyurethane PUR:
The typical molecular structure is ...-NH-CO-O-... This group is repeated
throughout the whole long molecule.
They are known under the names of Desmopan, Vulkollan, Elastomoll,
Moltopren, Porosyn.
Linear polyurethane are thermoplastics. With increasing number of links they
turn out to be elastic and later hard.
They are used as soft and hard foam and many other articles. It is on market
under Desmopan, Vulkollan,
Elastomoll, Moltopren, Porosyn.
Polyurethane fibres are used in textiles under trade marks like Dorlastan,
Elasthan (Germany, Lycra (USA).
Phenoplaste PF
Polycondensation of phenol or cresol with formaldehyde.
It is used in all electrical articles and as glues.
Phenoplastes are on market as Bakelite, Dekorit, Haveg,Pertinax, Trolitan, Trolitax.
Aminoplaste
They are obtained by polycondensation of formaldehyde with melamine.
Important types of aminoplastes are:
Melamine resin MF
Dicyandiamid resin DD
Urea resin UF
Polyester
The typical molecular structure is ...-CO-O-... (ester group). This group is repeated throughout the whole long molecule.
It is being obtained by polycondensation of high alcohols and carboxylic acid.
Using maleic acid or fumaric acid unsaturated polyester resines UP are formed.
They are known as Trevira, Diolen (Germany), Dacron (USA).
Epoxy resines EP
Reaction of polyaddition and polycondensation between epoxy (such as Epichloridrine) and a diphenol (such as diphenyl propane) originating an intermediate product which hardens together with phthalic acid anhydride or diethylentriamine as hardening agent
Polymethylmethacrylate PMMA.
It is the product of the polymerization of methacryl acid methylester
It is known as "organic glas" as security glas under the name of
Plexiglas and Resartglas.
Polytetrafluorethylene PTFE
Product of polymerization of tetrafluorethene.
It is stable up to 260
C, stable against ozone. It is used as gaskets.
Polyvinylacetate PVAC
It is a product of polymerization of vinylacetate and is used in solution as paint.
Products of cellulose
1.- Cellulose acetate CA
Esterification of cellulose with acetic acid anhydride in presence of sulphuric acid.
2.- Celluloid CN
It is cellulose dinitrate with camphor as plasticiser.
Polyamide fibres PA
It is on market under Perlon(Germany) and Nylon(USA).
Polyacrylnitril fibre PAN
It is a product of polymerization of acrylnitril. Dralon, Dolan (Germany) Orlon (USA)
On regard to vanishing natural resources it is important to reduce the quantity
of plastics as packaging material.
Industry should look to the example of German mineral water producers: They all
use the same standard bottle. This could also be done with all kind of food.
The glass could have the sizes of 125 , 200 ,250,400 500 and 750 ml.
For the size of 100 to 250 ml a 53 twist-off closure and 63 closure for 400 to 750 ml
glass should be used.
The refund system should be used and the glasses could be cleaned in central
washing factories sterilize and protecting the pallets with shrinkable foil.
Food producers could order glasses from the washing factory instead from the
glassworks.
The Heinz Ketchup would be found in the same bottle as Kraft Ketchup, the
Thomy mayonnaise together with Hellmann mayonnaise and all fine food together
with herring, mustard, coffee creamer and marmelade.
A universal glass for all products and brands is a nightmare for a marketing
manager but at the same time it is a blessing for the future of his son.
Label and closure gives sufficient ground for the work
of art designer to create an individual touch for every product and every
brand.
Unfortunately there is a move from glass to plastic as noted by
increasing number of packaging of soft drinks and soft drinks as well as
traditional products such as Nestlé Coffee Mate, the
coffee creamer of UK changing from glass to PET (polyethylene terephthalate)
jars with a shrink-sleeve label[352].
Reuse of bottles:
Glass bottles are reused about 45 times.
PET bottles are reused about 15 times.
As plastics fail to be recycled it is being burned. Precious materials are so
lost. We should try to change to glass packaging.
Recycling of glass in the way which is practiced at the moment
loses fossile or atom energy to melt and form glass packaging.
The refund and cleaning system of a standard glass packaging would reduce
energy needed to reuse glass and jars.
As recycling organizations such as The Green Dot in Germany and Spain fail to reach proper amount
of recycling of plastics, government should
regulate the Euro glass. This way is better as dissolving the recycling
organizations leaving the responsibility in the hand of every producer to
recall his own packagings.
Increasing problems with environment and vanishing resources will soon force
the producers to think over their marketing strategy. The situation will also
force the consumer to accept reduction of amenities which can no longer be
maintained.
Industry tries to change from glass to plastics because of reduced costs
in handling, weight transport costs and costs of cleaning, disinfection for
a reuse.
Due to regulations concerning recycling of packagings in Germany there is a
minimum share of 72% defined. This limit was not achieved in 1998.
It is sure that for 1999 the limit will not be achieved.
According to the
regulation there will be a compulsory deposit starting from the year 2000 of
0,50 Dm for beverage packagings from 0,2 liter up to under 1,5 liter and
greater packagings starting with 1,5 liter 1,00 Dm.
European regulations concerning packaging recycling
European guideline 94/62/EG from December
1994 regulates the recycling of packagings in the European Community.
According this guideline the government of the Community may regulate recycling of
packaging materials in order to promote reuse of bottles but they are not
allowed to create trade hindrances. Not recyclable packagings are therefore
protected by this regulation.
The guideline also defines a rate of 50 to 60% of use of packaging material
in any form whatsoever including heat recycling and 25 to 45% recycling the
material getting new products.
These scores are ridiculous low and shows that the governments should force
the introduction of standard packagings like the Euro glass.
The type of Packaging can interfere in the
growth of bacteria[436].
Aerobic bacteria can grow. Fresh meat packed in cellulose film so
as used in tray packaging is threatened by
Pseudomonads like Pseudomonas fluorescens and
Pseudomonas fragi as dominant bacteria producing smell
and slime.
The atmosphere in the packaging can be modified according to the food which is
being packed.
Enzymes, temperature and competitive growth can produce gas like CO
.
For some food gas packaging with modified atmosphere are used.
Vacuum inhibits the growth of aerobic microbes such as Pseudomonas,Bacillus,
moulds. In these packagings the growth of lactobacillus is dominant.
Enterobacteriaceae can grow under anaerobic conditions.
Nitrogen, CO
and in some cases O
are used.
Nitrogen has no activity against bacteria. It increases shelf life substuting
oxygen.
CO
acts bacteriostatic on gram negative aerobic bacteria and bactericide
because of its undissociated part of H
CO
which enables CO
to trespass the cell membrane and act bactericide on the cells of the bacteria.
Lactobacillus is not affected by CO
.
CO
can reduce growth of Listeria on meat.
| Polymer |
used as |
Filling product |
| PVdC,EVOH,Acrylnitril |
Oxygen barrier |
|
| PET/PVdc-PVC/PE |
multilayer foil |
red meat |
| HDPE, PVdC,PP |
water vapor barrier |
|
| PA/PE-PVC/PE |
multilayer foil |
treated meat |
| HDPE,PP |
stability,suitable |
|
| |
for microwave oven |
|
| |
|
|
| PET/PVdC/PE |
multilayer foil |
poultry |
| Nylon |
high temperatures |
|
| |
resistant |
|
| |
|
|
| PET/PE/PVdC-PVC/PE |
multilayer foil |
fresh fish |
| CPET |
mechanical resistance, |
|
| |
high temperatures |
|
| |
resistant, oxygen barrier |
|
| |
|
|
| PET/PVdC/PE |
multilayer foil |
Pizza |
| APET |
mechanical resistance, |
|
| |
oxygen barrier |
|
| |
|
|
| PET/PE/PCdC |
multilayer foil |
Cheese |
| Polyester |
high temperatures |
|
| |
resistant, flexibility |
|
| |
and resistant to perforation |
|
| |
|
|
| Metallized PET/PE-metallized PA/PE |
multilayer foil |
dried products,coffee |
| PVC/PET |
mechanical stability, |
|
| |
some types |
|
| Micropore foil-LDPE/OPP/PVCPA/PE |
multilayer foil |
fresh vegetables |
| |
|
|
| LDPE, HDPE, EVA |
sealing layer |
|
| EVA |
highly permeable to |
|
| |
oxygen and CO |
|
| Abbreviation |
material |
| ABS |
Acrylbitril-Butadien-Styrol Copolymer |
| APET |
amorphous polyester |
| CPET |
crystalline polyethylenterephthalat |
| ECTFE |
Ethylen-Chlortriefluorethylen Copolymer |
| ETFE |
Ethylen-Tetrafluorethylen-copolymer |
| EVA |
ethylen-vinylacetat |
| EVOH |
ethylenvinylalcohol |
| FEP |
Tetrafluorethylen-Hexafluorpropylen |
| HDPE |
highdensity polyethylen |
| LDPE |
lowdensity polyethylen |
| OPP |
streched polypropylen |
| PA |
Polyamid (Nylon) |
| PC |
Polycarbonat |
| PET |
Polyethylenterephthalat |
| PE |
Polyethylen |
| l
PFA |
Perfluor-Alkoxylalkan |
| PMMA |
Polymethyl-Methacrylat |
| PMP |
Polymethylpentene |
| PS |
Polystyrol |
| POM |
Polyoxymethylen |
| PP |
Polypropylen |
| PPO |
modified polyphenylenoxid |
| PTFE |
Poly-Tetrafluor-Ethylen |
| PVC |
Polyvinylchlorid |
| PVdC |
polyvinilidencloride |
| SAN |
Styrol-Acrylnitril-Copolymer |
Multilayer foils may have PE, PVdC and PET as typical components.
[494]
Saint-Eve and colleagues 2008 studied the influence of packaging polymers
(polypropylene or polystyrene) and glass on yogurts with 0% or 4%-fat
content during the 28 days of storage at 4
C. The authors found that
0%-fat yogurt conditioned in glass displayed the lowest aroma quantity
decrease of the three types of packagings. Polystyrene packaging was found to
be preferable before polypropylene in limiting aroma compound losses and for
avoiding odour and aroma defects. The 4%-fat yogurts were less affected by
the packagings.
- Plastic bags are bad because they may contain PVC which develops toxic
gases as it is burned. Use paper bags.
- Aluminum cans are hostile to environment because they can hardly be recycled.
- Greaseproof paper is better as plastic foodwrap because the later may
contain harmful softener
Nonylphenol in food
[1642]
Nonylphenol is an industrial chemical which interacts with human hormones and
produces cancer. Its synonyms are p-nonylphenol,4-nonylphenol,
C
H
O. Nonyphenoles were found in mineral waters due to migration
from the plastic seal of the caps of bottles.
Another source of nonylphenol in food arethe nonylphenolethoxylate which are
used in the production of plastics for wrappings and packagings of food.
Nonylphenolethoxylate act as emulsifier and stabilizer in plasticizers for
Packagings. Nonyphenoles are breakdown products of norylphenolethoxylate
detergents usedin household and industrial
cleaning products.which contaminate food. Their contact with foods leads to
the contamination with nonyphenoles.
Very high amount of nonylphenoles were found in apples and in tomatoes by the
Research Center in Julich.
The estimated human intake of nonylphenoles is 7.5 microgram a day. The
content of nonylphenole in pesticides are now being analyzed.
Baby milk in Tetrapack was found in October 2005 as being contaminated with
traces of Isopropilthioxantone. This chemical is being used for carton
printing leaking from the carton to any fatty products like milk when it is
exposed to sunlight's ultraviolet rays. Researches indicate that the migration
of ITX has no known health
effects. According to Tetra Pax ITX is not prohibited for use in food
packaging by the EU. However EU packaging rules, as amended in 2003, require
that food contact materials do not migrate into products meant for human
consumption.
EU regulations:
- Commission Directive 2002/72/EC of 6 August 2002 relating to plastic
materials and articles intended to come into contact with foodstuffs.
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2002:220:0018:0058:EN:PDF
- Corrigendum to Commission Directive 2002/72/EC of 6 August 2002 relating
to plastic materials and articles intended to come into contact with foodstuffs
(OJ L 220 of 15.8.2002)
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32002L0072R(01):EN:HTML
- Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council
of 27 October 2004 on materials and articles intended to come into contact with
food and repealing Directives 80/590/EEC and 89/109/EEC
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:338:0004:0017:EN:PDF
- Commission Directive 2004/19/EC of 1 March 2004 amending Directive
2002/72/EC relating to plastic materials and articles intended to come into contact with
foodstuffs
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:071:0008:0021:EN:PDF
ITX is being used as curing process during ultraviolet printing processes when
using UV inks. This process is also being used for packaging for water,
juices, ice teas. No migration was occurring for most of those beverages,
except in the case of some citrus juices such as orange and lemon, and milk.
Clear juices such apple, grape and cranberry do not seem to be affected.
The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) will undertake a risk assessment of
the chemical. Health concerns about packaging chemicals, such as phthalates,
have raised consumer awareness of about the risks posed by materials that may
come into contact with food.
[1643] [1644]
According to the German BfR the occurrence of a chemical in a food does not in
itself constitute a risk to health. It is the harmfulness of the substance and
the degree to which the consumer comes into contact with the substance that
determines the scale of possible damage and the probability that it will
occur. Residues of printing inksin foods may, therefore, be safe but they may
equally constitute a serious risk to health.
Talks between the Plastics Committee and representatives of the printing ink
industry at BfR revealed that no technology is currently available to prevent
the migration of substances from printing inks to food through a set-off
effect or because of penetration of the packaging material. Nor is this
situation likely to change in the short term.
Given the lack of data, a health assessment is frequently not possible at the
present time. As the manufacturers bear responsibility for the safety of their
products, they should do everything in their power to prevent the migration of
substances of this kind to foods and put together the data needed for a health
assessment.
The printing inks may contain the photo initiator isopropyl thioxanthone
(ITX). Public agencies in Italy and Germany have detected residues of ITX in
foods from cartons. Cartons for beverages like milk, cocoa or juice are often
printed in different colours and have benn found to contain the ITX compound.
Also olive oil has been found to be contaminated with ITX.
ITX is contained in UV-hardening printing inks. The cardboard used to make the
packaging may be transported on rollers to the food filling plant and then
moulded on site into the corresponding packaging. Constituents of the printing
inks applied to the outer packaging material can, by means of spread
(set-off), reach the inside that comes into contact with food.
Furthermore, there may be migration through the packaging material in the case
of pre-moulded packaging unless effective barrier layers, e.g. aluminium
foils, have been applied. BfR has examined the available toxicological data
for the chemical isopropyl thioxanthone (ITX).
In line with the assessment scheme of the European Food Safety Authority and
customary assessment practice at BfR and regarding substances used in the
production of food commodities, the available data on the exclusion of
genotoxicity are only sufficient to evaluate substances with a maximum
migration level of 50 microgram/kg food. As, however, the ITX measurements in
Germany revealed far higher levels, additional data would be needed for
toxicological assessment. BfR does not have the necessary data on toxic
effects, bioavailability or toxicokinetics of the substance.
Actions:
A larger manufacturer of beverage cartons has informed BfR that it switched to
a new printing method for infant and baby food on30 September 2005. It no
longer uses any UVhardening printing inks in orderto prevent migration of ITX
from the package to the food for milk and fatty products.
The phenomenon of the migration of constituents from printing inks used on the
outer packaging to foods as a consequence of both penetration of the packaging
material and set-off to the inner packaging is a fundamental issue. Set-off
cannot, in principle, be ruled out for any packaging material processed on
rollers or in stacks. Besides the data on ITX, BfR is also aware of migration
findings from packaging to food for other photo initiators used in printing inks
like 2-ethylhexyl-4-dimethyl aminobenzoate and
4,4'-bis(diethylamino)-benzophenone and 4,4'-bis(dimethylamino)-benzophenone. BfR
is, therefore, of the opinion that there is an urgent need to lay down
requirements for the use of printing inks for food commodities on the European
level.
[1645]
According to the Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) concentrations of
up to 5 milligram per kilogram of the chemical di-isobutylphthalate (DiBP)
have been found in food such as fat-containing, powder and fine grain foods
like rice, baking mixtures or breadcrumbs packaged in cartons.
In animal experiments DiBP was found to be reprotoxic and embryotoxic. It is
used as a plasticiser in dispersion glues for paper and packaging and when
they are recycled DiBP can be found in paper and board packaging. The BfR and
the Federal Environmental Agency (UBA) advocates a voluntary undertaking by
the manufacturers and processors of paper and board to no longer use
DiBP-containing glues or printing inks to reduce the DiBP content in recycled paper.
The data from long-term toxicity studies are not available therefore BfR
recommends a specific restriction on the migration of DiBP to foods, a
so-called specific migration guidance value, of 1 milligram DiBP per kilogram
food. For baby and infant formula this value should be 0.5 milligram. This
was based on the Health assessment made by the European Food Safety
Authority (EFSA) on di-n-butylphthalate (DnBP) which has a similar structure
and effect.
DiBP is being proposed to be classified as reprotoxic substance and to be
included in Annex I of the Dangerous Substances Directive 67/548/EEC)
[1646]
Phthalates in medical devices
[1647]
Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) is a plasticizer used in medical products
made with polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plastic and may be toxic to humans. DEHP is
lipophilic and binds noncovalently to PVC, allowing it to leach from these
products. Medical devices containing DEHP are used extensively in neonatal
intensive care units.
Previous research has shown that newborns treated at neonatal intensive care
units may receive doses of DEHP at 2-3 times the average daily adult exposure.
Studies have linked di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) with reproductive and developmental toxicity, and have demonstrated an especially pronounced effect on testicular development when administered postnatally.
The study classified low-DEHP exposure group including infants receiving primarily bottle and/or gavage feedings; the medium exposure group included infants receiving enteral feedings, intravenous hyperalimentation, and/or nasal continuous positive airway pressure; and the high exposure group included infants receiving umbilical vessel catheterization, endotracheal intubation, intravenous hyperalimentation, and indwelling gavage tube.
Ronald Green and colleagues conclude that intensive use of DEHP-containing medical devices in intensive care units results in higher exposure to DEHP as reflected by elevated urinary levels of MEHP in these infants. The use of phthalates should be reduced, if possible completely eliminated from products which come in contact with food, as well as in medical devices or other applications which come in contact with humans.
[373]
| Product |
Modified atmosphere |
Remarks |
| Red meat |
80% O + 20% CO |
CO reduces growth of Pseudomonas |
| |
|
aerobic bacteria which often |
| |
|
spoils red meat.High concentration |
| |
|
of oxygen is needed to keep red colour. |
| |
|
|
| Porc |
60% O + 40% CO |
CO reduces growth of aerobic bacteria |
| |
|
less O is needed because of reduced red |
| |
|
colour of porc compared with beef |
| |
|
|
| Poultry |
50 - 80%CO + 20 - 50% N |
A high headspace with gas is important |
| |
|
|
| Sausages |
20% CO + 80% N |
|
| |
|
|
| Sliced heated meat |
20% CO + 80% N |
|
| |
|
|
| Fish, high-fat |
60 - 70% CO + 30 - 40% N |
No oxygen should be used |
| |
|
to reduce rancidity |
| |
|
|
| Fish, low-fat |
30 - 40% O + 30 - 70% CO |
Oxygen is used to keep red |
| |
+ 0 - 40% N |
colour of low-fat fish and seafood |
| |
|
It also reduces growth of anaerobic |
| |
|
bacteria such as Clostridium |
| |
|
and its toxins |
| |
|
in case of long shelf life |
| |
|
|
| Sliced fish,cooked |
20% CO + 80% N |
|
| Hard Cheese |
80 - 100% CO + 0 - 20% N |
|
| Sliced hard cheese |
80 - 90% CO + 10 - 20% N |
|
| Soft cheese |
20 - 40% CO + 60 - 80% N |
|
| |
|
|
| Gateau |
50 - 70% CO + 30 - 50% N |
Storage at +4 - +7 |
| Cake and bread |
20 - 40% CO + 60 - 80% N |
|
| |
|
|
| Pizza |
30 - 60% CO + 40 - 70% N |
|
| Pommes frites |
70 - 80% CO + 20 - 30% N |
|
| Salads with dressings |
100% N |
|
Spoilage of food can be caused by:
- The nature of bacteria and their amount.
Bacteria can be aerobic,
growing in presence of oxygen such as Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter and
moraxella.Or they are anaerobic,
growing in absence of oxygen such as Clostridium producing toxins and
Lactobacillus producing lactic acid.
- Water activity a
- pH
- Cell breathing
- Composition of the food
- Storage temperature.
Low temperatures reduces bacteria growth.
Some bacteria grow even under low temperatures, the psycrophilic
like Pseudomonas
- Hygiene during production
Bacteria can be present in the raw material,additives and environment, such as
our skin,used utensils and air.
- Gasatmosphere
oxygen can cause rancidity, oxidizes vitamins, Nitrogen can
replace oxygen.
Oxygen is sometimes necessary to keep the red colour of fresh meat.
The choice of the gas to be used during filling is therefore very important and
varies from one food to another.
- Good Manufacturing Practice
CO
reacts with water forming carbonic acid which increases acidity of the product reducing
bacteria growth.Nitrogen can replace CO
In Products such as cottage cheeseand dairy cream CA packaging
with nitrogen instead of oxygen is being used.
Hard cheese is packed under up to 100% CO
to reduce bacterial activity and
stabilizes consistency of the product.
Soft cheese is packed under 20 - 40% CO
because otherwise the packaging would
shrink because the gas gets in solution with the product.In this case 30% of
of CO
should not be exceeded.
[374]
Different attempts have been undertaken to slow down oxidation and its effects on rancidity and browning of meat like the use of rosemary extract as ingredient, or adding the extract to the polypropylene film used to package freshly cut meat, and the use of carbon monoxide modified atmosphere packaging.
Factors which influence the colour of meat are temperature, relative humidity, oxygen partial pressure, light, and lipid oxidation.
Rosemary extract: Such natural extracts allows meat packagers to use high-oxygen atmospheres in sealed packages to maintain freshness without having to worry about browning.
Carbon monoxide modified atmosphere packaging: Meat and meat products kept under low-oxygen atmospheres with carbon monoxide look fresh for much longer time than any other artefact. The gas reacts with the meat pigment myoglobin to create carboxymyoglobin which has a pink colour.
FDA and carbon monoxide in modified atmosphere packaging
FDA had allowed carbon monoxide use as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) in meat und tuna
packagings to keep it looking fresh. The GRAS regulatory category allows producers to use an additive or a procedure without public review or formal agency approval.
A petition, filed by Kalsec(R), Inc. of Kalamazoo, Michigan, in 2005, urged the FDA to withdraw its July 2004 decision and related decisions to allow the presence of carbon monoxide in meat packaging. http://www.co-meat.com/release.html and http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/dockets/05p0459/05p-0459-cp00001-toc.htm
Consumer groups such as leaded by Donna Rosenbaum of Safe Tables Our Priority, an advocacy group in Burlington, and the Consumer Federation of America wrote to the FDA in support of a ban. The groups argue that carbon monoxide may mask visual evidence of spoilage resulted from storage temperature variations. They challenge the Food and Drug Administration for allowing the practice without a formal evaluation of its impact on consumer safety.
As an alternative to a ban, consumer call for carbon-monoxide-treated meat labelling so they can decide on what they are buying.
Industry representatives say that the use of carbon monoxide is safe because other signs like odour, slime formation and a bulging package are indicators of spoilage.
The consumer groups allegate that FDA regulations under the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) expressly prohibit the use of carbon monoxide in "fresh meat products", the FDA did not have legal authority to permit the use of carbon monoxide because it is an unapproved and prohibited color additive. Regulations of the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) prohibit the introduction of ingredients in fresh meat that function to conceal damage or inferiority, or give the appearance the product is of better or greater value.[375]
European Union ban of carbon monoxide as colour stabilizer
The European Union has banned the use of carbon monoxide as a colour stabilizer in meat and fish. A December 2001 report from the European Commission's Scientific Committee on Food concluded that the presence of CO may mask visual evidence of spoilage should the meat become inadvertently warmer at some point
Modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) gases are classed as food additives under two Acts, the Directive of food additives (89/107/EEC) and the Directive of the use of food additives other than colours or sweeteners (95/2/EC). In June 2003, The European Parliament Environment Committee voted to outlaw carbon monoxide as a food additive, and thus as a MAP gas, because it could mislead the consumer as to the freshness of the meat by maintaining the red colour of the product
Japan, Canada and Singapore also ban the use of carbon monoxide in tuna.
Preservation methods: There is a growing demand for minimal processed foods without synthetic chemical preservatives. Preservation methods are being developed using high pressure systems, asseptic filling, ohmic heating, pulsed electric field, irradiation and bright light technologies.
[376]
Plastics are made from ethylene, propylene, styrol, polyester such as polycaprolacton, Polyesteramide and polyesteruretane aall coming from petroleum.
Widely used plastics are:
- Polyethylene PE
- Polystyrol PS
- Polypropylene PP
- Polyvinyl chlorid PCV
In 10 years the world demand for plastics doubled, summing 224 million tons in the year 2004.
Europe consumed one fourth of the world output, whereas Germany accounted for 17,5 million tons/year, which is 8% of the world production, more than half of it, 9 million tons, were used as packaging.
In an effort to counter further growth of petrol packaging, bioplastics are being developed using renewable raw materials like starch, cellulose, sugar gelatine, chitin, polyhydroxicarbon acid ester and polyamin acid won by biotechnology technology. Their price is, however, up to four times higher as petrol originated plastics. The world production of bioplastics in 2004 summed only 250.000 tons
Other raw materials which are used to form bioplastics are
Some bioplastic articles are foamed duroplastic from starch as trays for vegetables and other foods and bottles from PLA for mineral water.
The use of starch as packaging material: [383]
Different projects are running to improve water resistance of starch and starch plasticizers for the preparation of thermoplastic starch (TPS) for use in structural packaging materials for consumer products. Despite all efforts, application of TPS is still limited by its low mechanical and water resistance. Corn starch and cassava bagasse which is a by-product from cassava starch production are renewable sources for thermoplastics. [377]
Synthetic biodegradable polyesters fall into two broad categories. One is highly amorphous, imparting flexibility and clarity comparable to a conventional LDPE copolymer. A second group of semicrystalline polyesters is more rigid, with properties similar to PET, PP, or PS. [378]
Starch is an abundant, inexpensive, renewable, and fully biodegradable natural raw material. However, the hydrophilic character of starch leads to poor adhesion with the hydrophobic polymer in starch-polymer blends. In spite of its relative weakness and a about 60
C melting point that is too low for many applications, polycaprolactone (PCL) has recently received much attention due to its flexibility and biodegradability. Additionally, similar to other aliphatic polyesters, such as polylactide (PLA) , polyglycolide (PGA), PCL and their copolymers. PCL is, however, more expensive. Hence a blend of PCL with the cheaper material starch, with a reactive functional group grafted onto PCL to improve adhesion and dispersion of the two immiscible phases, would appear to offer the best of both worlds.
Blends of regenerated cellulose and polyeteruretane are also being developed. Cellulose is built of polymerised glucose units. Thermoplasticity and biologic degradation are related to degree of derivatization (the number of hydroxil groups OH of each glucose unit which have been substituted) Every glucose unit has three OH group The average substitution degree AS value [German DS ) can vary from 0 to 3.
Derivates with AS 2.5 up to 3.0 are thermoplastic and can be extruded with available equipment. However only derivates with AS number below 1.5 are biodegradable.
To overcome this problem derivates with low AS numbers and long side chain with
low AS number are being tested, such as cellulosepolyhydroxihexan acid ester. [379]
Polylactic acid (PLA) may become an alternative to PET, HIPS, PVC, and cellulosics in some high-clarity packaging roles. It is synthesized from processed hybrid corn rich in amylose. Cargill has signed a joint venture partnership with Japan-based Teijin Limited to manufacture and market polylactic acid (PLA) under NatureWorks in 2007.
Recently an acrylic acid grafted polycaprolactone and starch composite (PCL-g-AA/starch)
was considered to present best results for packaging material. [380][381]
Improved functionality of bioplastics and their growing market lead to more interest. Moreover, the risks created by imports and increasing costs for fossil raw materials play as much a role as climate change, whose negative effects are becoming increasingly pronounced. In consequence the plastics industry is putting more and more emphasis on the use of renewable raw materials. [382]
Calcium carbonate and binding agent as packaging
The packaging material, called Calymer from Ecolean , consists of 40% calcium carbonate and polymers, which simply act as the binding agent. This material is flexible and tough with exceptional environmental properties.
Incineration transforms the binding agent of packaging waste the into water vapour and carbon dioxide and the calcium carbonate is returned to nature.
Polylactic acid (PLA) biodegradable packaging [384]
Polylactic acid (PLA), a material made from corn that can be used for food packaging under the brand Biophan.
The switch to biodegradable packaging is being driven by environmentally-conscious consumers the price of oil and recycling regulations.
Polylactic acid can be transformed within 45 days in CO
in a composting plant. The German Packaging Ordinance, giving preferential treatment up to 2012 to biologically degradable packaging supports this packaging material.
Innovations on the field of biodegradable plastics
Amcor, together with Plantic Technologies develop a biodegradable, flexible plastic packaging for confectionery.
NatureWorks, a Cargill daughter released a polymer of corn starch, the polylactic acid (PLA) .
Danisco has produced a biodegradable plasticiser from hardened castor oil and acetic acid.
Stanelco markets a natural, biodegradable food packaging based on starch, called Starpol 2000.
BASF will launch Ecovio plastic, a biodegradable plastic made up of 45 per cent PLA from NatureWorks together with biodegradable plastic Ecoflex, which is derived from petrochemicals.
Companies which have been using PLA plastics as packaging for foods like organic milk in US is Naturally Iowa. Retailers like Delhaize in Belgium and Auchan in France have also been testing PLA for various food packaging.
Other edible films [385]
Films forming solutions composed of Amaranth (Amaranthus cruentus) flour (4.0 g/100 mL), stearic acid (5-15 g/100 g of flour), and glycerol (25-35 g/100 g of flour) were prepared by an emulsification process. The films produced under these conditions exhibited superior mechanical properties (2.5 N puncture force, 2.6 MPa tensile strength, and 148% elongation at break) in comparison to those of other protein and polysaccharide composite films,
[386]
Low density polyethylene (LDPE) film widely used in agriculture for mulching crops could become substituted by degradable plastics which do not need to be removed from field at the end of the season.
Plastics derived from petrochemicals degrade very slowly. Degradables plastics degraded rapidly by photodegradation and/or biodegradation.
Degradable plastics made from starch-based polymers are
Photodegradable Polymers
The breakdown of photodegradable plastics depends on irregularities in the polymers and photosensitive substances, called promoters, such as carbonyl groups and metal complexes, Their chemical composition varies:
- Carbonyl Group: Ketone Carbonyl Copolymers
A carbonyl group, vinyl ketone comonomer, is added to the polymers of plastics such as polyethylene (PE) and polystyrene (PS). the finaldegradation requires the material to be consumed by microorganisms. This material is ideal for mulch film and products that usually end up as litter.
- Carbonyl Group: Carbon Monoxide Copolymers
It is not known whether carbon monoxide products completely degrade into non-plastic products or whether they simply disintegrate into smaller pieces of plastic.Carbon monoxide copolymers.
- Metal Complexes
Plastics containing metal break down in the absence of light receive enough UV light before burial they can be used in landfills and tree shelters. heavy toxic metal residues such as nickel, cobalt, and iron remain in the soil after degradation.
Biodegradable Polymers
Biodegradable plastics are polyesters, polyhydroxybutyrates, and vinyl polymers. They are degraded by microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi, and algae. Some biodegradable plastics are:
Starch-Based Polymers:
They are the most commonly used and lowest-costing ingredient of all biodegradable polymers.
The starch can be derived from corn, potatoes, and rice. According the to manufacture methods there are:
- Surface-Modified Starch Additive·Starch is treated with a small amount of an unsaturated fat or a fatty acid oxidizing agent, such as vegetable oil.
- Gelatinized Starch Additive: Gelatinized starch is used in films of polyethylene coacrylic acid (EAA) and in a mixture of EAA and low density polyethylene.
- Thermoplastic Starch Materials: They contain 70-100 percent starch as the base for the
polymer. They have great water-solubility are very easily
consumed by microorganisms.They are indicated for mulch films, bags for animal feed and
fertilizer, and products that will end up in water.
Other degradable plastics are:
- Polyesters: Polyglycolic acid (PGA): Used as a controlled drug release and as material used in cirurgy.
- Polylactic acid (PLA): Produced from fermenting crops and dairy products PLA is used as packaging and paper coatings, sustained release systems for pesticides and fertilizers, mulch films, and compost bags.
- Polycaprolactose (PCL): Its use in agriculture are as mulch, seedling containers and slow release of herbicides to control aquatic weeds.
- Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB): It is produced by microorganism. It has poor resistance to solvents. Its uses are unknown.
- Polyhydroxyvalerate (PHBV): Its use is limited to medicine and pharmacy because of high production cost, films and paper coating.
Vinyl:
Polyvinylalcohol: Used in packaging and bagging applications. It is water soluble.
Polyvilylacetate: Uses are unknown. It is watersoluble.
Polyenlketone: Water soluble with unknown uses.
Polyhydroxyalkanoates [387]
Polyhydroxyalkanoates or PHAs are linear polyesters produced in nature by bacterial fermentation of sugar or lipids. More than 100 different monomers can be combined within this family to give materials with extremely different properties.
They can be either thermoplastic or elastomeric materials, with melting points ranging from 40 to 180
C. The most common type of PHA is PHB (poly-beta-hydroxybutyrate). PHB has properties similar to those of PP, however it is stiffer and more brittle.
To produce PHB a culture of a micro-organism such as Alcaligenes eutrophus is placed in a suitable medium and fed appropriate nutrients so that it multiplies rapidly. Once the population has reached a substancial level, the 'diet' is changed to force the micro-organism to create PHB. Harvested amounts of PHB from the organism can be anywhere from 30% to 80% of the organisms dry weight.
A PHB copolymer called PHBV (polyhydroxybutyrate-valerate) is less stiff and tougher, and it is used as packaging material.
Antimony in PET water bottles [388]
Antimony trioxide is used as a catalyst in the manufacture of PET (polyethylene terephthalate), plastic bottles. Prof. William Shotyk, Dr. Michael Krachlerand and co-workers at the Institute of Environmental Geochemistry, University of Heidelberg found antimony to be leaching to the bottled drinking water. The antimony content of PET bottled waters increased in proportion to its storage time.
According to Shotyk and Krachlerand pristine groundwater was found to contain only two parts per trillion of Sb, with the PET bottled waters typically showing values a few hundred times greater. This is because PET material contains several hundred mg/kg of the metal whereas rocks and surface soils contain less than 1mg/kg antimony.
Japanese alternatives to antimony: An alternative to antimony as catalyst is insoluble titanium which is used in for PET bottles made in Japan.
Recommendations to the consumer: Polypropylene bottles are manufactured without antimony trioxide. Glass bottles do not leach antimony. Consumer should therefore buy water filled in glass or PPE (polypropylene) bottles.
Tin coating and bisphenol [389]
Most foods contain very low concentrations of tin. Canned foods may contain higher levels because the tin coating used to protect the steel body of the can from corrosion can slowly transfer into the food.
Tin leaching present no health effect on the consumer apart stomach upsets such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, abdominal cramps and bloating in some sensitive people at levels above 200 milligrams per kilogram. This is the maximum legal amount of tin that can be present in canned foods.
Limits for tin for particular categories of cans are:
- 100mg/kg for drinks.
- 50 mg/kg for infant and baby foods.
- 50 mg/kg for dietary foods for special medical purposes intended specifically for infants.
Lacquered cans are used for acidic foods. This avoids tin corrosion but leads
to bisphenol-A leaking. This substance is an endocrine disrupter which
interacts with hormone systems, such as the female oestrogens and male
androgens. No evidence of a link between harmful effects on human reproductive
health and exposure to endocrine disrupters have been reported so far.
[390]
Bisphenol A is an endocrine disruptor that affect reproduction and brain
development in animal studies. The effect on humans is not clear yet. It is
being widely used as a monomer for the production of polycarbonate and epoxy
resins for food and beverages plastic packaging and the resin linings of food cans.
Belcher and colleagues found in 2008 that exposure to BPA occurs mainly by
consumption of contaminated foods and beverages that have contacted epoxy
resins or polycarbonate plastics.
According to the authors high temperatures increases the migration of BPA to
food and beverages. The authors found no difference between new and used
bottles. The temperature was found to influence drastically the release of
the chemical. In polycarbonate water bottles, which had not been previously
submitted to heat, BPA was found to migrate at rates ranging from 0.20 ng/h
to 0.79 ng/h. After a brief exposure to boiling water, rates increased to 8 to
32 nanograms per hour.
The authors concluded that BPA migration from polycarbonate drinking bottles
should be included in the total Endocrine Disrupting Chemical-burden
"EDC-burden". Industrial hot bottling of juices and other beverages, widely
used to increase self-life may boost the release of harmful BPA.
[392] Bisphenol A is used extensively in
the plastic lining in food cans. The National Toxicology Program published in
April 2008 a statement concluding that there was some concern for neural and
behavioural effects in foetuses, infants, and children at current human
exposures to BPA. There are evidences that the compound induces cancer at
current exposure levels.
As a precautionary measure NTP recommends to "reduce the use of canned
foods, and, when possible opt for glass, porcelaine or stainless steel
containers, particularly for hot foods or liquids."
The Environmental Working Group (EWG) had reported in 2007 that BPA could
leach into canned food at levels reaching 200 times the acceptable amount.
[393]
These findings are backed by the study of the Center for the Evaluation of Risks
to Human Reproduction CERHR Expert Panel on Bisphenol A []
FDA is now being requested to set the maximum level for regulatory use.
In Europe the EFSA hat set a tolerable daily intake (TDI) level for BPA of 50
micrograms/kg body weight/day.
[395]
The Panel considered the significant differences between
humans and rodents, such as the fact that people metabolise and excrete BPA
far more quickly than rodents. This body of evidence further limits the
relevance of low-dose effects of BPA reported in some rodent studies used for
human risk assessment.
In its previous risk assessment, the Panel derived a TDI of 0.05 mg/kg body
weight based on the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) of 5 milligram/kg
body weight/day for effects in rats and included an uncertainty factor of 100.
In this latest assessment, the Panel concluded that this TDI provides a
sufficient margin of safety for the protection of the consumer, including foetuses and newborns.
EFSA NOAEL setting for bisphenol is in conformity with different studies on this
matter, such as the report of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food
Safety, (VKM, 2008), which concluded that the findings did not provide sufficient
evidence for setting a robust lower NOAEL than the current NOAEL set by EFSA at 5
mg/kg body weight/day. [396] [397] [398]
Permeation of atmospheric oxygen through PET bottle [399]
Despite problems of materials leaching from PET (polyethylene terephthalate)
bottles, they are still predicted to dominate drinks packaging markets.
Growing beverage market leads to an increase of PET bottles on market.
Atmospheric oxygen permeability is a problem to producers reducing self-life.
Looking for test procedures for the determination of the stability and/or
durability of beverages in plastic packaging. WILD developed a test procedure
which simulates reality of a typical several month storage on the product
quality within less than three weeks, the test being suitable for al kinds of
passive barrier packaging.
Latex proteins are used in packaging material transferred to food in some
cases, according to the study by Leatherhead Food International working for FSA.
There are four major latex allergens: Hev b5 and Hev b6.02 , Hev b1 and Hev
b5. No safe level oif latex are defined, but it seems that small traces can
trigger an allergic reaction. Labelling of the latex content in packaging
material is being proposed by some groups.
It wasn't clear from the research that allergens were being transferred from
latex packaging to food. More work is required to accurately measure the
levels of latex in food and the FSA is doing researche work on the matter. [400]
Latex assessment 2005 [400]
UK FSA released a report on 19 January 2005 on the assessment of latex
protein transfer from contact materials into food and drink products.
According to the Agency the study indicated the presence of one or more of
the latex allergens in 7 out of 21 commercial packaging materials (e.g.
chocolate bar and ice cream wrappers).
Low levels of latex allergens (Hev b3 or Hev b5) were found in 3 of the 7 foods tested.
This research has shown that latex allergens may be present in some food
packaging materials and that there is the possibility of transfer from the
material to the food. A modified ELISA method has been developed to detect and
quantify latex allergens in packaging and foods. Further work is required to
improve this method to make it a fully validated, quantitative, robust
analytical technique. Latex allergen transfer has serious implications for
some individuals.
FSA latex project 2006 [401]
Another research project of April 2006 will build on previous Agency-funded
work (A03043) through development of an improved, validated enzyme linked
immunosorbant assay (ELISA) that is robust and reliable. This assay will be
used to determine the presence of latex allergens in food contact materials
and associated foods.
Project A03043 included a review on the type and extent of latex protein
containing material used industrially. Additionally, it was demonstrated that
latex allergens were present and detectable in food packaging materials. When
the method was applied to food matrices, overall recovery for allergens Hev b5
and Hev b6.02 was reasonable (at 68±28% and 89±18% respectively).
However, Hev b1 and Hev b3 proved difficult to extract from food matrices and
measurement of these allergens in food could only be considered as
semi-quantitative at best. Overall, the results indicated that further
technical work was required to develop reliable and robust validated ELISAs
for the quantitative recovery of latex allergens, especially Hev b1 and Hev
b3. The most relevant matrices were identified as confectionery, dairy and
pastry products.
The modified ELISA protocol will be re-established in the laboratory and used to
measure allergen levels in representative batches of cold seal adhesive and
bakery release films. The project will try to increasing the recovery of Hev b1
and Hev b3 from selected confectionery, dairy and pastry products. Validation of
the new extraction and ELISA protocol will follow.
[402]
The Guide to Evolving Packaging Design published by Waste and Resources Action
Programme (Wrap) is focused on retailers and manufacturers.
Important companies have signed commitment to cut down on packaging going to
landfill. [403]
Retailers can push their suppliers to reduce the amount of material used or
moving to more recyclable, reusable and biodegradable materials.
New annual targets set by UK regulations increase manufacturers' obligations to
the market to recover and recycle their packaging under international and
European pressure on the UK to decrease carbon emissions.
Reducing the weight of beer bottles spares glass and transport costs. Other
companies changed from glass to plastic bottles and succeeded to set it on
market.
Experts should bear in mind that migration of pasticizers and other unwanted
chemicals takes place from the plastic bottle to the food, which is not present
when glass is used. The oxygen barrier is not as perfect as the 100% barrier
of glass bottles.
Another idea was to use different containers for similar products simplifying
processes.
[402]
The regulations allow accredited waste reprocessing companies to sell Packaging
Waste Recovery Notes (PRNs) for
every tonne of packaging waste they recycle. Companies with 2m pounds sterling
turnover or handling in excess of 50 tonnes of packaging a year meet their
obligation, assessed under the scheme, by buying PRNs.
The profits are reinvested in the recycling infrastructure. This resembles the
European Green Dot, where all packaging pay fees for the recycling. This system
is not compulsory in UK. [404]
[405]
Estrogenicity of xenoestrogens found in food wrap packaging and phytoestrogen
flavonoids. Uterotrophic and vaginal cornification assays were studied on rats
by Stroheker and colleauges in 2003. Genistein, bisphenol F, and octylphenol
were identified as estrogenic only in immature rats. While apigenin and
kaempferol appeared to have low estrogenic activity, they potentialized the
uterotrophic effect of 17 beta-estradiol in immature rats.
In this study the authors found that phytoestrogens like genistein can be as
potent or even more estrogenic than compounds found in food wrap packaging. Tha
authors suggest the vaginal cornification to used as a sensitive and useful
test to detect weak estrogenic compounds to which humans can be exposed via
food.
Searching for alternatives to petroleum-based packaging such as polyethylene
terephthalate (PET)
supermarket chains Sainsbury from UK and Delhaize from Belgium move its
private label products to biodegradable packaging in an effort to reduce
rubbish collected for landfill.
Justin King of Sainsbury called on government to ensure that every home in the
UK has a compost bin. Degradable plastic is made from oil a fossil fuel with
additives to enable it to break down to CO2 plus water. Compostable sugar
cane trays, and the use of polylactic acid (PLA) packaging for punnets or
pallets. Polylactic acid is a corn-based biodegradable polymer made by
NatureWorks, a part of Cargill, are being tested.
PLA is already used in many fields:
Serviceware: disposable Dixie cups, dishware, forks, knives and
spoons that are used only once, then thrown away.
Rigid Containers: precut salads, fruit, vegetables and convenience
store and fast food restaurant bought fountain drink cups.
Bottles: vinegar, water, milk, juice et
Biodegradable packaging decompose in 2 years. Traditional non-biodegradable
packaging takes more than 200 years to return to the earth and creates harmful
greenhouse gases when burned. [406]
PHB polyhydroxibutirate new plant operations
planned to start in 2008, the new plant will produce Biocycle, a biodegradable
plastic using sugar as raw material
The Pedra Sugar Mill, in Serrana, in the region of Ribeirao Preto, in the State
of Sao Paulo, is Brazil produces. Polyhydroxibutirate, sugar-derived plastic
under the Biocycle trademark.
The pilot plant produces 60 tons of Biocycle a year.The entire production is
exported to companies in the United States, Japan and Germany PHB is
biodegradable. Packing made with PHB is degraded into water and carbonic gas in
six to 12 months.
According to the producer, a kilogram of the sugarcane polymer costs US$ 5,
whereas a kilogram of other biodegradable plastics, made from beet or corn, for
instance, costs US$ 14.
According to Jefter Fernandes do Nascimentooday the world produces 200 million
tons a year of polypropylene. PHB is not indicated to replace all the uses of
polypropylene, but in the next years it will take between 1% and 2% of that
market.
A packaging for eucalyptus seedlings made with PHB plastic were launched. Three
months after the seedling has been planted the PHB degrades into the soil.
Productivity increases at paper and pulp plants farms.
A research group from the Institute of Biomedical Sciences (Instituto de
Ciencias Biomedicas, ICB), of the University of Sao Paulo (Universidade de Sao
Paulo, USP), led by biologist Ana Clara Schemberg, selected the bacterium -
Alcaligenes eutrophus, found in sugarcane fields
soil - and produced a transgenic variety that is more efficient in synthesizing
PHB.
The process in stages organizes the plant's operation, which is divided into
three main blocks: fermentation, in which the bacteria reproduce and synthesize
the polymer; extraction, in which the polymer is taken out of the bacteria; and
purification and drying, in which the organic residues - in other words,
bacteria remains - are eliminated from the polymer. The selling of eucalyptus
seedlings placed in PHB packaging promising cost reduction and productivity
gains since the seedlings are planted directly into the soil, the elimination
of handling prevents contamination, which affects 20% of the plants when
conventional tubets are used.This will be extended to coffee, pupunha (known as
spiny peachpalm) and papaya seedlings.
[408] [409]
Mouldy off-flavour can be caused by 2, 4, 6 trichloranisol and is found in
foods like wine raisins, ethereal oils, bottled mineral water and others.
The sources of trichloranisol are various. Aung and colleagues, for example,
demonstrated that sterilized raisins formed trichloranisol under low water
activity nonconducive for microbial activity. [410]
There are many sources of trichloranisol in wine.
Cork:The best known cork oak forests are located at the Mediterranean
region, comprising large areas of Algeria, Tunisia, Morocco, southern Europe
including Italy, Portugal, Spain and France. The cork oak develops a thick
bark of cork. Trichloranisol content of the bark is relatively low, but
increases in the lower part of the trees, as it nears the ground. Humidity
increases near the ground triggering mould activity. That is why near the
ground yellow colouration of cork an and trichloranisol content rises.
Chlorphenols: The most frequent source is the transformation of
chlorphenols by several types of moulds. Chlorphenols are used in agriculture
as pesticide, in packagings, in the wood industry and in cork forestry. The EU
forbids therefore the use of pesticides in cork oak plantations.
Chlorine: Chlorine can come from residues in cork and wine barrels.
Cork is bleached and wood barrels are treated with sodium hypochloride.
Blanching of cork is now being done with hydrogen peroxide.
Pollution of the wine cellar: Trichloranisol may heavily contaminate
the atmosphere of the wine cellar and migrate to the stored wine.
Crown-capped bottles: Trichloranisol has already been found in
bottles with crown cape and glass plugs. In these cases the corkiness
off-flavour had been originated before bottling. Wood barrels might be the reason.
Analytical quality control tries to sort out high trichloranisol charges of
cork. Water steam treatment and even microwave oven were seen to remove
trichloranisol, however other valuable odour and flavour components were also
removed.
Mousy off-flavour of wine [411]
According to Eleanor M. Snowdon and colleagues mousy off-flavour occurs when
wines are infected with either lactic acid bacteria or Dekkera/Brettanomyces.
Snowdon write that 2-ethyltetrahydropyridine, 2-acetyltetrahydopyridine, and
2-acetylpyrroline are responsible for the off-flavour.
The authors say that the microbe's metabolism probably plays a key role in
mousy off-flavor formation, and that oxygen may play a key role. A wine infected
with Dekkera/Brettanomyces in the absence of oxygen may not become mousy unless
exposed to oxygen via a processing or handling procedure
.
Koni Grob and colleagues 2006 tested the migration of plasticizers from PVC
gaskets into oily foods packed in glass jars oil at standard conditions
(pasteurization/sterilization followed by 10 days at 40
C), and found
migration far below that observed in reality; after 20 days at 60
C,
migration was above average in reality, but still did not reach the worst case
required by legislation. ESBO, DEH, DEHS and ATBC, Citroflex A were included
in testing. [412]
Ezerskis and colleagues 2007 tested foods and gaskets and found epoxidised
soybean oil (ESBO) to be the principal plasticiser in 53% of the tested
gaskets. Polyadipate in 27% and Diisodecyl phthalate (DIDP) in 20%.
ESBO
hat the highest migration rate, with concentrations in food up to 281.9mg/kg
(max allowed= 60 mg/kg).
The authors found also high migration rates of di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
(DEHP), up to 8.7 mg/kg (max allowed=3 mg/kg) in 40% of the food samples.
Total polyadipate (PA) concentrations of 16.3 mg/kg in average (maxPA
allowed=30 mg/kg) were found to be acceptable.
The authors suggest the polyadipates, having the lowest migration rates of the
tested platicisers, as plasticisers for PVC gasket seals used in food
industry. [413]
Koni Grob and colleagues 2007 support the findings of studies saying that
polyadipates seem to be the only acceptable plasticizers for PVC gaskets. They
suggest dilute the plasticizers with others of low viscosity for a better
handling. According to the authors storage test for two years showed
migration of polyadipate clearly below the limits and the migration of ESBO
was found several times higher. [414]
[415]
According to Koni Grob and colleagues 2006 epoxidized soy bean oil (ESBO) was
found to be toxic for rats, but the toxic constituent is unknown. Analysing
the components of ESBO the authors found a possible effect of epoxy oleic
acid to be negligible. Diepoxy linoleic acid was found similar to the
exposure from oxidized fats and oils of normal diet. Only triepoxy linolenic
acid from ESBO exceeds that from normal food by around two orders of
magnitude. The authors suggest therefore the use of an epoxidized edible oil
virtually free of linolenic acid.
[416]
Koni Grob and colleagues 2005 wrote that the migration of epoxidized soy bean
oil (ESBO) from the gasket in the lids of glass jars into foods, particularly
those rich in edible oil, often far exceeds the legal limit (60 mg/kg) and
propose a method of testing ESBO in foods. According to the authors the new
method has a detection limit between 2-5 mg/kg, depending on the food, with
uncertainty of the procedure being below 10%.
[417]
Recycled paper and cardboard may contain toxic inks, adhesives and other dyes
which may migrate to foods like pizzas, curry sausages which heat up the
cardboard. For this reason recycled materials are not permitted in pizza boxes
in Italy. Phthalates such as diisobutyl phthalate were found in pizza boxes in
2008 by Monica Bononi using a new developed testing method for phthalate
migration in paper and cardboards.
The new method is a useful tool for the packaging industry to measure the
amount of DIBP emanating from recycled cardboard, paper and seals for caps for
glass jars.
German manufacturers and processors of paper and cardboard recently decided to
stop using products containing DIBP due to safety concerns.
The Australian consumer group CHOICE found in June 2008 that more than half
of baby foods in jars were contaminated by phthalate used as plasticizer in
the seal of the cap. The group says that there is no immediate health danger
to individuals, however, it is the long-term health implications of
plasticisers migrating into foods which is of concern.
CHOICE calls for the food industry to find safe alternatives to epoxidised
soybean oil(ESBO) and phthalates, and regulators should sets limits for
plasticisers in food. [418]
[419]
A single analytical procedure is presented for determination of so-called
monomeric plasticisers such as di(2-ethylhexyl) adipate, polymeric
plasticisers such as poly(butylene adipate), and secondary plasticisers such
as epoxidised soybean oil, in stretch-type films. The combined method offers
significant savings in time compared with the separate analytical methods
published earlier for monomeric and polymeric poly(vinyl chloride) plasticisers.
Epoxidised soybean oil (ESBO) as plasticizer and stabiliser in PVC gaskets
ESBO in seals for baby foods [420]
The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) evaluated in May 2004 the dietary
risk of epoxidised soybean oil (ESBO) used as plasticizer and stabiliser in
polyvinyl chloride (PVC) gaskets of metal lids used to seal glass jars and
bottles for baby foods packed in glass jars and bottles, and considered the
formation of derivatives of ESBO such as chlorohydrins, which may occur as the
PVC is heated to high temperatures.
The estimated exposure of infants aged 6-12 months to ESBO migrating into baby
foods packaged in glass jars and bottles with metal lids sealed with PVC
gaskets can sometimes exceed the Tolerable Daily Intake (TDI) of 1 mg/kg body
weight by up to 4- to 5-fold. Since there is an inbuilt safety factor of more
than 100 in the derivation of the TDI, exceeding the TDI by 4- to 5-fold does
not imply that there will be adverse health effects in infants. Moreover, the
Panel notes that ESBO is neither carcinogenic nor genotoxic. However, such a
situation is undesirable because it could reduce on a regular basis the safety
margin between exposure and adverse effects.
The Pannel recommends to develop a specific migration limit for ESBO in baby
foods, derived from the TDI of 1 mg/kg body weight for infants of 6 months of
age, weighing 7.5 kg, fed mainly or exclusively on processed baby foods.
The Pannel cannot give an advice on the significance for health of
derivatives of ESBO in foods because of absence of toxicological data. The
Pannel stresses that up to 5% of the fatty acids in ESBO in gaskets is
converted into derivatives. The Pannel calls for further analytical and
toxicological data on ESBO derivatives.
Adults exposure to epoxidised soybean oil (ESBO) [421]
According to EFSA 2006, ESBO is used up to 40% in PVC gaskets of metal lids of
glass jars and in PVC cling film up to 10%. The overall exposure from these
applications is compared to the TDI of 1 mg/kg bw for ESBO set by the SCF (SCF,
1999)
.
The plasticiser di(2-ethylhexyl)adipate (DEHA) is frequently used in combination
with ESBO in cling films. Like ESBO, DEHA is practically insoluble in foods with
no fat and so migrates only into fatty foods. Finally, DEHA is a much smaller
molecule than ESBO and so its tendency to migrate from cling films is higher than
ESBO. As a consequence of these factors, it can be concluded that consumer
exposure to ESBO migration from cling films will
be no greater than exposure to DEHA. The metabolite of DEHA found in urine of
adults is 2-ethylhexanoic acid (2-EHA).
The Scientific Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids and
Materials in
Contact with Food (AFC) evaluated the risk of adults resulting from the
migration of epoxidised soybean oil (ESBO) into foodstuffs such as
sauces,condiments and products in oil packaged in glass jar with metal lids
lined with polyvinyl chloride (PVC) containing ESBO.
ESBO can be present up to 40% of the weight of the gasket and is also used
plasticised PVC cling films for wrapping foods.
Because of the high migration figures, an estimation of the exposure of adults to
ESBO was necessary in order to find out if the TDI of 1 mg/kg body weight set by
the Scientific Committee on Food (SCF, 1999) was exceeded. The Pannel concluded
that the potential high dietary exposure of adults was estimated to be 0.25 mg/kg
bw/day, and that the potential dietary exposure of adults to ESBO from foods
packaged in cling films will not exceed 0.2 mg/kg bw/day, and that the potential
dietary exposure of adults to ESBO from foods packaged in glass jars and in cling
films is below the TDI of 1mg/kg bw as set by the SCF (SCF, 1999). The Panel
considered therefore that further refinement of the exposure estimates was not
necessary.
[422]
Koni Grob and colleagues 2008 says that the official method for
testing migration from the gaskets of lids into oily foods is not suitable for compliance
testing of lids.
A glass jar containing oil is closed with the caps to be tested, turned on its
lid and heated 1 hour at 100°C and 1 hour at 130°C, simulating pasteurisation
and sterilisation respectively. Prediction of migration during 5 years storage is
performed measuring the migration after 10 days at 40°C.
Keeping the jar turned on its lid gets the
whole content of the jar in contact with the lid and equilibrium of migration
is completed involving all oil and not just 30 ml sticking to the lid under
normal conditions.
Speed of migration at 40°C accelerated only by a factor of 2.4 the platicizer
such as ESBO and and 3.9 for polyadipate, variation occur with the oil used,
while migration measured with coconut oil being 2-3 times that with olive oil.
ESBO was found by the authors to be left behind a layer of PVC which stops
the migration during the test.
The authors concluded that the described official method is not suitable to
extend the 10-day testing to a prediction for years in general manner and they
call for testing under a more realistic scenario.
Charles Onwulata 2007 looked for the use of whey, a byproduct of cheese
production. He developed a way to use it in the production of candy, pasta,
animal feeds and a process called reactive extrusion to supplement
polyethylene with whey proteins.
Reactive extrusion involves forcing plastic material through a heating chamber,
where it melts and combines with a chemical agent that strengthens it before
it's molded into a new shape. Onwulata and Seiichiro Isobe combined whey
protein isolate, cornstarch, glycerol, cellulose fiber, acetic acid and the
milk protein casein, creating a biodegradable plastic product that can be mixed
with polyethylene.
Bioplastic blends can only replace about 20 percent of
the polyethylene in a product, is only partially biodegradable. However,
Onwulata and his colleagues, looking for completely biodegradable bioplastics
are experimenting with polylactic acid (PLA).
Polylactic acid (PLA) is a commercially available
biodegradable polymer derived from lactic acid and is used in many nonfood
products as an alternative to petrochemical-derived polymers. PLA substituted
with starch-whey concentrates and casein blends (DPB) may enhance the
properties of this polymer. Onwulata says that dairy proteins, whey and casein,
may provide an advantage by lowering the molded product peak temperature of PLA
allowing for more biomaterials to be used in a formulation.
[424]
Onwulata 2006 evaluated the properties of several blends of extruded
agricultural materials and found that the properties of extruded blends in
pellet form made from milk protein, casein and whey protein isolates, starch
and glycerol milk protein based (MPB) were most suitable as feed material for
injection molding. Injection molded MPB cups demonstrated that agricultural
materials based on dairy ingredients can be processed directly in equipment
used by the plastics industry. [425]
[426]
BASF will increase its production of biodegradable plastics up to 60.000
Tons/year by 2010. Ecoflex, a is petrochemical-derived, fully biodegradable,
complying with DIN EN 13432 (requirements for compostability) and Ecovio is
45 per cent polylactic acid- based. It is being increasingly sought after by
food processors as both a renewable and bio-based source of packaging
coatings. Both product rages are petrochemical based. Starch substitutes only
partially the oil derivates.
According to BASF the materials are used to make carrier bags, compostable can
liners, mulch film, food wrapping, and for other applications. Both properties
- biodegradability and a high renewable raw material content - are increasingly
sought after in the competitive global materials market.
Biodegradable and renewable packagings face almost threefold prices compared with
traditional plastics. The requirement of full compostability in 90 days according
to DIN EN 13432 must be fulfilled. Last but not least only 45 per cent comes
from renewable sources. 55% are still petrochemicals.
[427]
Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP) works in partnership to encourage
and enable businesses and consumers to be more efficient in their use of
materials and recycle more things more often. This helps to minimise landfill,
reduce carbon emissions and improve our environment. Important issues are
reducing weight of packaging material, changing to 100% recyclable carton.
Redesigning packaging current packaging can improve food protection and
reduces costs, such as happened with the introduction of the light glass bottle.
[429]
Bioplastics are produced from renewable raw materials which capture carbon
from the atmosphere by plants. Incinerating or composting biopackaging this
renewable carbon is returned to the atmosphere.
Fossil fuels is needed in the production of biopackaging, therefore it is not
free of additional co2 emission. Bioplastics presents a potential to reduce
the dependency on crude oil and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Composting could produce humus in arid-zones as an additional advantage as
fertiliser and substrate in soil.
Opening up these composting systems for biopackaging, is another way of closing
the loop for these innovative packaging solutions. In addition, composting
systems are economically very competitive compared with incineration. The
generated compost can be used to increase the carbon content in the soil and to
maintain soil fertility.
- The use of renewable resources for their production: It is
subject to individual interpretation how big the share of renewable resources in a plastic
product has to be in order to be called a bioplastic. No standard is available to
approve this.
- Their biodegradability / compostability: It can be
assessed through the European norm EN 13432, (2000). This norm is used by the
association European Bioplastics to approve plastic products if the marketer
advertises the product to be "compostable" or "biodegradable".
According to European Bioplastics
plastic bags and other products, e.g. agricultural mulching foils, made with
polyethylene (PE) with the claim of being "degradable", or "bio-, UV- or
oxo-degradable", and sometimes even "compostable"" do not fulfill this
standard and were lawsuited.
The Environmental Agreement (EA) in the form of a unilateral self-commitment by
industry ensures the keeping of an internationally recognised standard for the
biodegradation of polymers, produced from both, renewable or fossil resources.
[430]
According to Bioplastics the production will tend to
biobased/non-biodegradable plastics in near future, however, the barrier
properties and heat resistance must be improved. Usual polylactic acid (PLA)
softens at a temperature of about 60
C and is not deployable for several
applications. New PLA is being developed from D- or L-lactic acid to resist
heat up to 175
C.
Due to a low CO2-barrier carbonated beverages lose their sparkling character very
soon at the moment. Furthermore, the high permeability of steam reduces the
shelf-life. However, it is expected
that new PLA types and barrier layers will widen the scope of applications very soon.
A new polylactic acid (PLA)-based resin from Cereplast, inc. withstands
temperatures as low as -35
C, compared to about 20
C for standard
PLA-based plastic with good structural properties. [431]
Brazil Braskem will strengthen their production of polyethylene from sugar cane,
so-called "green PE".
[433]
The directive includes several requirements to reduce the organic component of
waste. It permits explicitly the burning, the treatment in a mechanical
biological facility and the mixed composting of organic waste components, but
that the waste can no longer be used for soil improvement.
Like the EU parliament and the "biowaste coalition", comprising 12 European
countries, the European Bioplastics supports the idea of a dedicated Organic
Waste Directive that is unfortunately not yet on the agenda of the EU Commission.
[430]
German government acknowledged the environment friendly potential of
biopackaging with the amendment of the Packaging Ordinance by releasing
bioplastic bottles from deposit obligation. The ordinance states that bottles
with more than 75 percent RRM content will not be charged with a deposit fee. The
privilege postpones the obligation of installing recovery systems to a point of
time after market introduction. [432]

OurFood (c) 1998 - 2008 by Karl Heinz Wilm - Imprint (Impressum)